Mauritania has began exploit his offshore oil on earlier February 2006, a big risk for the marine life. It is feared that a environmental disaster happens if sound measures are not taken to protect flora and fauna in this part of Atlantic Ocean.
The first drilling of Chinguitt exploited by a consortium of international companies leaded by the Australian Woodside is located at 75 kilometers south west of Nouakchott, the capital. This zone known for its fishing fertility is a precious field of capture for hundreds of Mauritanian fishermen, particularly the traditional ones whose daily live is based on this income. By the way, the pollution of the sea due to the hydrocarbons rejections represents a serious risk on the fishing sources and marine environment. The survival of aquatic flora and fauna is directly linked to preservation of the intrinsic functions of the ecosystems. And faithful to maintain such ecological balance mains the deterioration of integrity and diversity of Nature in this zone.
What are the risks due to the offshore oil exploitation?
The oil exploitation, if it is not suitably controlled and strictly watched, will be at the origin of ecological disasters of very big scale, a Mauritanian oil issues expert warns. According to Ismael Abdel Vettah*, these disasters can have, essentially, one of the following origins if the adequate treatments are not made before their offshore rejections:
- Muds of drilling,
- The rubbles of drillings,
- Waters of deposits.
He explains that Muds of drillings are fluids used during the drilling to stabilize the ground and avoid the eruptions of hydrocarbons contents in rocks. “They have to be on base of water. Those on base of oil must be used only if the geologic and geophysical data require it. In case of use, strict treatments must be made before the offshore rejections by respecting faithfully the international current standards. Various additives in the mud to modify its characteristics and adapt it to the drilled ground must be chosen with great attention and treated also in the same conditions than in the mud itself”.
The expert whose talks have been reported by the Mauritanian daily “Nouakchott Info” added that the rubbles of drillings issued of crossed rocks which contain at the same moment the mud and the fluids of deposits must be treated with efficiency by respecting the current standards before their offshore rejection. “Waters of deposit resulting from the separation, on surface, of the hydrocarbons in gas, in crude oil and in water, must be very finely handled and injected in the geological formation to maintain the pressure in depth of the reservoir. Accidental, very grave pollutions resulting from the draining of the offshore crude oil during the various operations of the chain of oil exploitation and expedition can happen. But points enumerated above, have the advantage to be able to be better controlled”.
“The rejections of the residues of the offshore polluting products obey strict international standards”, Mr Abdel Vettah said, underlying that “these require, for the oil, the respect for the following limits: the concentration of hydrocarbons contained in the sea water does not have to exceed an average of 30 mg / l over 12 h, and must be situated between 30 and 150 mg / l over less than 90 minutes after the moment of the rejections”.
He estimates that to exploit this new wealth, indispensable to the development of the country and to the prosperity of his inhabitants, two alternatives are possible:
- The first one allows to be inspired by the example of the bordering countries of the North Sea (Scotland, Norway etc..) which knew how to prosper thanks to their hydrocarbons while remaining big producers of the Sea products. These countries set up very strict systems of control to prevent that multinationals make the offshore rejections not corresponding to the current standards.
- The second consists in following the example of certain countries of the Gulf of Guinea which let foreign companies make what they want without control. The marine animal-life there has completely disappeared because of the pollution generated by the draining without treatment of the offshore toxic products and an ecological imbalance appeared with catastrophic consequences on the populations of these countries.
Mr Abdel Vettah thinks that Mauritania has to opt for the first alternative by focusing on environment respect. “She thus has to get closer to countries situated on the coasts of the North Sea and to try to follow their example. Studies missions must be sent in the Scotland and in Norway to be inspired by their system of control”.
“The government has to set up a structure of control of the offshore oil operations. This structure has to be autonomic and endowed with qualified staff and sophistic equipments allowing it to fulfill suitably its role of guarantor of the absolved respect of the standards governing the offshore rejections of the toxic products”, he concludes.
Is the Government aware of dangers?
But the Mauritanian official authorities have likely not been enough aware of the stake of these environmental issues at moment of negotiating the deal with foreign companies. The agreement concluded between the two parties mentions vaguely the necessity of avoiding sea pollution without specifying exactly what must be done concerning this subject.
According to the contract terms, Woodside is committed to give the Mauritanian government the amount of 1 million dollars per year in counterpart of eventual damages on environment. Though this contract has been denounced after the overthrow of President Maaouya Ould Taya on August 2005, it still not giving guarantees for the preservation of marine ecosystem. The gigantic platform of extraction still pour out scraps of oil and gas in the sea without significant control, said the ONGs acting in environmental field. This threats not only fishes but hundreds thousands of birds witch leave annually the cold regions in Europe to the « Banc d’Arguin” bey, near of Nouadhibou, the second big city of the country.
For its part, the World Union for Nature (UICN) had urged the Mauritanian government to plan concrete actions of suitable management of its coastal zones to guarantee the preservation of ecosystems. The achievement of these required actions imply:
· A total comprehension of the environmental and socioeconomic impact of offshore oil management tools,
· A good comprehension of the needs for reinforcement of long term capacity,
· A total comprehension of the stakes of oil in general,
· A comprehension of the actors for the need of formulating a legal framework of the environmental management of the offshore oil exploitation and the maritime transport,
· A comprehension of the role of the civil society in the methods of management of the oil exploitation.


Posted by maarouf
Posted by maarouf
Posted by maarouf